Don Quixote Was a Steel Drivin’ Man

Entries categorized as ‘review’

Desert Island Books

May 8, 2008 · 6 Comments

A very smart former student wrote to me (well, emailed me) last week to ask me for reading recommendations. The way he put it was that he wanted recommendations for 5 books, other than stuff I teach (so there goes Clarissa). I have been thinking about this often since getting his message, and it is really, really hard. How do I balance factors–the impact a given book had on me at a certain moment, vs. those that later helped me make sense of many other things? Should I make sure to include an array of genres, or centuries, or styles, or nationalities? Should I credit things I read 20 years ago and loved intensely but haven’t thought about much since then? Should I prefer authors who’ve written lots of great books over those who’ve written one undeniable masterpiece? Should I prefer neglected classics over more obvious things? Should I work in the fact that I probably read Trollope and Wodehouse more than any other authors these days (for fun, anyway)?

I’ve decided to err on the side of what might be called “pure reading experience.” And I had to break it down into separate categories for all-time and recent books… Mixing the two just seemed ridiculous.

All Time:

Cervantes–Don Quixote

Rousseau–Confessions

Jorge Luis Borges–Labyrinths

George Eliot–Middlemarch

Henry James–The Bostonians

“Recent” books

J M Coetzee– Disgrace

Robert Hass– Praise

Jhumpa Lahiri–Interpreter of Maladies

Anne Carson–The Beauty of the Husband

Ian McEwan–Atonement

Bonus:

Wallace Stevens–The Palm at the End of the Mind

(could go in either category really)

Categories: Professors · books · old books · review
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

War, Tragedy, and Country Music

April 25, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Laura Cantrell has a new electronic-only “EP” out and it’s fantastic. I put the term EP in quotes because, while it is the term Laura has chosen to apply to this release, it is actually long enough, at 34+ minutes, to qualify as an album. I guess it’s not an album because it is all covers, and includes some tracks that have been floating around for a while.

But it is great, simple, stripped down country music, perfectly adapted to her evocative and understated voice. Three tracks are highlights, the kind of tunes you would have built mix-tapes around back in the day. The greatest of all is her version of New Order’s “Love Vigilantes.” Now, recording 80s hits in in the idiom of very different musical genres is no longer a revolutionary gesture, given that there is a band out there that does nothing but record 80s music in Bossa Nova form, but this one is a stunner. I remember lying on my bed and listening closely to the lyrics when the New Order single came out, and being totally caught up in the bizarre sentimental tragedy being described. The song’s narrator comes home from the war only to witness his wife receiving a telegram informing her of his death. The lyrics were extremely out of place in a 80s club dance track, to put it mildly.

Laura Cantrell performs another dizzying act of estrangement with the song, but she does so by appropriating it to a genre (country weeper) and to a historical moment (an endless, tragic war) for which the song makes perfect sense: “you just can’t believe the joy I did receive/ when I got my leave.” She has made an excellent choice in actually keeping close to the original rhythmic structure of the song (although the arrangement has transformed the pulsing beat from dancey to ballad time, the beat is still emphatic).

Coupled with her compilation cover of “Sam Stone,” Laura has now recorded two of the most interesting war-themed songs during the Iraq debacle, both notable for being narrated by very sympathetic soldiers.

The other absolutely killer tracks here are the title tune, a Burt Bachrach number that also sounds utterly at home as a country standard, so much so that listening to Laura sing it made me forget where it came from and I had to go look it up, and one of my very favorite Merle Haggard songs, the picture-perfect composition “Silver Wings,” about a lover flying away on an airplane, that manages to sound both ultra-country and ultra modern despite being composed in the mid 70s.

There are many other great moments on the EP too, these are just the ones that stand out the most. If you download it, make sure to go over to Laura’s website and throw in some of the great free covers she has made available there, such as her (in my mind definitive) version of Elvis Costello’s “Indoor Fireworks.”

to recap:

Trains and Boats and Planes EP at Emusic

More free DLs at Lauracantrell.com

And listen to “Love Vigilantes” and “Trains and Boats and Planes” at her Myspace

Categories: Music · politics · review
Tagged: , , ,

Invisible Restaurants: The Florist’s Bahn Mi So

April 21, 2008 · Leave a Comment

The outside of the shop is truly uninviting: a squat little square tarpaper-roofed building stuck between an improbable high-rise semi-private UT Austin dorm (The Dobie tower) and an abandoned fast food taco joint with its now logo-less Sombrero shape hovering between landmark and eyesore. When you walk into the tarpaper box, you find yourself in an unruly florist shop, specializing in leafy green plants, with nary a cut flower in sight. You are likely to be distracted by the tables of hippyish “Native American Jewelery” in the right hand margin of the space, apparently sub-leased from the Vietnamese family running the show. In fact, I walked into a few times and retreated quickly, fearing an encounter with Patchouli-scented knickknacks, without noticing the two little tables for lunch in front of the cashier’s booth of the florist shop. On closer inspection (actually, with the guidance of my friend Stephanie, who is apparently less frightened of Patchouli than I am), I discerned a small menu listing items such as “Vietnam Coffee” and “Sandwiches: Pate and Chicken, $2.00.” That cashier’s booth, it turns out, was also a food shack capable of working miracles.

You all know the wonders of Vietnamese iced coffee. But even those of you who love Bahn Mi So haven’t had ones like these. The bread was a quite serious baguette, very French in style with thick crust and a crumb with some heft to it (as opposed to the almost gossamer quality of many Bahn Mi So rolls, which could, ungenerously, be mistaken for decent-quality supermarket Italian rolls). Toppings were lettuce, shoelace thin mandolin slices of carrot and cucumber, and carefully plucked cilantro leaves. The meat (if you ordered it) was freshly pan fried and nicely warm. And the sweet, chile-peppered dressing with just a subtle hint of fish sauce, coupled with the thick, tasty slices of apparently home-made pate, was perfection.

Tragically, the family sold out on this business and instead opened a dry-cleaning business a few blocks away on MLK. While I hope they did well—they certainly earned good karma with every delicious sandwich they essentially gave away for $2 or so—it was galling that their new business was actually the third dry-cleaning operation located at that one intersection.

While I recommend any Bahn Mi So that you can get your hands on, the other ones I’ve had are generally so light on the pate that you hardly know it’s there…

Editor’s note: this shop operated in the Austin, TX in the early to mid ninties. It was subsequently replaced with a chain used-CD shop and then a chain sandwich joint… Neither of which was capable of performing miracles. And note that the above picture is not one of the Florist’s miracles.

Categories: Invisible Restaurants · food · review
Tagged: , , , ,

Richardson’s Clarissa

April 14, 2008 · 3 Comments

I have just spent much of the semester reading Clarissa (and forcing my grad students to read it too). We read the full c.1,000,000 words of the Penguin edition (based on the first 18c edition–there were actually other later longer18c editions, but they aren’t available in course texts)…. This despite one of my colleagues starting a rumor that we were clearly going to read an abridged version because the whole thing is unfeasible.

Here’s the thing: Clarissa in the long version is an amazing reading experience. It’s immersive and relentless. Richardson never lets up. Despite the fact that the plot can, famously, be summed up in one brief sentence, the plotting is brilliant, ever-present and always intense. Much of the discussion and criticism of the novel makes it sound like it is endlessly introspective, but that’s really untrue. Despite its bulk, it is a crisp, tense read.

Giving it a long, careful reading makes me feel that this novel is the key to understanding the English novel.

Categories: 18th century · old books · review

Invisible Restaurants 1: Chef Ho’s

February 22, 2007 · 1 Comment

Invisible Restaurants:
Capsule Reviews of Restaurants No Longer in Existence

Chef Ho’s Dumpling House, Pell St, Chinatown, NY NY

This formica and florescent-lights Pell St. joint may not have appealing atmo, but take note that while you never have to wait long for a table, you will always have to wait. Two dishes you simply must order—Three Delicacies Dumplings (pork, shrimp, and leak), the number one house specialty, and gingery pan-fried noodles with chicken. Order them, close your eyes against the surrounding bleakness, and luxuriate. Three delicacies are that great Chinatown rarity—a dumpling that, while not fried, nonetheless achieves nearly erotic possession of the palate. Indeed, these small, unspeakable tasty morsels have suffered the indignity not simply of the steam tray, but of actual immersion in boiling water. And yet… The little paper signs on each table advertise “Three Delicacious Dumplings,” and while mere unfamiliarity with the rigors of the English tongue may have produced the term “delicacious,” the unearthly joy produced by this seeming simple mixture of shrimp, pork, leek, and flour justifies the new coinage. While the pan-fried noodles are not, it must be conceded, unique—and non-believers have gone so far as to complain that they are “greasy”—they are beautifully fried curly wheat noodles of a medium thickness, quite golden on the top and bottom (with the occasional noodle scorched black), covered in succulently juicy slices of chicken breast, broccoli, and cliché-chinese veggies like bamboo shoots and baby corn. But there’s none of your uptown-style bird’s nest of pre-deep-fried crunchy chow mein noodles—so sure they’re “greasy,” they’ve actually been in a wok of sizzling oil within living memory. And so cheap.

Ed note: Chef Ho’s Dumpling house went out of business somewhere between 1994 and 1996. It was replaced by Joe’s Shanghai, original NYC home of the soup dumpling, and one of the greatest Chinatown joints of all time.

Categories: Invisible Restaurants · New York City · food · review
Tagged: , ,

Old Guidebooks to NYC: A Beginner’s Guide

February 20, 2007 · 2 Comments

A Review Essay

Reading new guidebooks about potential destinations is no fun. Even just flipping through them is a nerve-wracking experience, as you imagine the potential humiliation of being underdressed for dinner, of being unable to afford to order anything more than a cup of coffee, of badgering your lover into traveling to a remote spot in a scary neighborhood to sample an obscure (to you) cuisine, only to find the place has gone out of business by the time you arrive.

That’s why—or one of the reasons, anyway—I love reading guidebooks from the past. None of this stuff matters anymore. You can’t be underdressed for dinner at the Pavillion, (NYC’s first truly great French restaurant, which grew out of the World’s Fairs) or bring a woman to the wrong room in Luchow’s (open from 1882 to 1982) anymore. For that matter, you can’t be tricked into ordering an unsatisfying “health food” meal based around cottage cheese—as opposed to the delicious fish options—at Brownies (which was either featured or parodied in The 7 year Itch,) anymore, either. And, as a bonus, superannuated guides are among the most scorned ephemera of our culture; used bookstores, at least if they know what they’re doing, won’t stock them, and certainly wouldn’t pay you for yours. Church booksales, maybe the occasional down-on-its-luck thrift shop, are the only emporia indiscriminate enough to waste space on such worthless treasures.

But the liberation such guides offer is not merely from fear of potential bamboozlement and humiliation. In the immediate present we actually need to know how much stuff is going to cost. This would make a genuine temptation of Arthur Frommer’s Dollar Wise Guide to New York (1966), which promises unfailing pricing accuracy: “our aim is to show you precisely how much each element of your trip will—transportation, hotels, meals, nightspots, tours, shopping—will amount to in dollars and cents.” And it is conveniently pocket-sized. Kate Simon’s New York Places and Pleasures (Meridian, 1959) on the other hand, would be very dangerous as an actual guidebook. You sit down to figure out where to go for lunch, inviting the possibility that you will emerge from your reading, starving but edified, only at dinnertime.

Simon’s book is an insider’s guide, written chiefly to point out possibilities that the jaded city-dweller might overlook. You can gauge Simon’s attitude toward tourists by what she calls them: “outlanders.” She’s perfectly ready to help them find their way around—but that’s NOT what she had in mind when she wrote the book. Her descriptions of the sights and smells of a walking tour through Spanish Harlem (an open air market, the smell of chuchifrito and mofongo, stands selling ceviche, radios playing dance music, and animated discussions of “beisbol” and hitting “hon rons”), and of the experience of shopping in the original Loehman’s women clothing store amid semi-clad shoppers (no dressing rooms) ready to pounce on one another’s cast-offs, are brilliant novelistic set-pieces. The tips she throws in about stores, restaurants, and museums would appeal much more to the bleary-eyed denizen than the outlander. What tourist wants to know that there’s a secret back room in which you can avoid the piano & zither duo? Her book, it could be argued, has always been better as a work of imagination than as a source of practical hints for urban navigation. It allows you to sink deep into the role of the all-knowing urbanite, as long as you stay in your easy chair.

Although Simon’s is easily my favorite supperannuated guidebook, the Underground Gourmet (1970) while something of a one-note wonder, is almost as absorbing a read. It’s the anti-Zagat; compiled by two guys (Milton Glaser and Jerome Snyder—with those names, you gotta trust them) equally compelled by their bellies and their stinginess. Despite being at least as self-consciously utilitarian as Frommer’s little guide, it is also deeply, almost dementedly, impassioned. The rules are fairly restrictive: the book only includes places where you could, in 1970, get a whole dinner for $3.00 or less. Really, the book is the portrait of a personality type: the guy who is an absolute compulsive about finding deals, who has unfailingly exacting and reliable tastes—this is almost out of his hands, given that he suffers from a compulsive personality disorder—but who, for some reason, cannot rest easy until he has validated his own brilliance by passing on his finds to those qualified to appreciate them—even knowing that his recommendation could ultimately destroy this once mighty secret pleasure. Maybe this power-fantasy, of destroying one’s own brilliant discovery through the untrammeled force of one’s recommendation, is the whole point of the enterprise? Glaser and Snyder warn: “There is the nagging philosophical problem which we grapple with constantly, namely: what negative effect does discovery and publicizing of a relatively unknown restaurant have on its basic character and style” (Some Thoughts page, unnumbered).

Restaurants come alive in their treatment. And they evoke a more innocent day when a low price was license to eat anything, guilt free. They make various low-profile joints sound like enchanted islands, oases within the city. Electra, a Greek diner with unfailing service, impeccably prepared food, and authentic, delicious Greek specials every day—and open 24 hours—is the image of a place I am always seeking but haven’t yet found outside of this book. The brief section on food carts, despite a disclaimer that they don’t endorse eating standing up, is particularly fecund of culinary daydreams. On the whole, set in the hazy, semi-inconceivable past of NYC in 1970, this little book, at its best, is Calvinoesque, a kind of gastronomic Invisible Cities.

Apparently, the Underground Gourmet, in its more earthly and practical incarnation, achieved a good deal of popularity. My copy is an updated, newly revised edition for 1970 (the first printing was 1966). I have also come across a spin-off, The Los Angeles Underground Gourmet. Unfortunately, this volume, first printed in 1970, can’t hold a candle to its progenitor. It’s slimmer, but advertises itself as a “complete guide.” The failure to restrict to cheapo joints drains the project of its particular flavor and leaves one unsatisfied. Most of the reviews are almost grudging. One complete review reads: “dishes here are prepared with fresh vegetables. Delicious whole-grain breads, homemade soups, and there’s a lovely crab ‘thing’ with melted cheese and pistachio nuts.” Of course, there is the occasional thrill of elliptical mystery, as in the near-haiku: “Agreeably surprising food: fresh vinegary salads,
terrific fish.” And despite conveying very little information, “a crazy fried apple blintz that’s oddly tasty” has its appeal. Despite such incidental poeticism, however, many of the two or three line reviews suffer from undigested repetition of the “health food… healthy foods” variety. If the original NYC version is a hot, satisfying, $3.00 bellyful, the LA volume is an inoffensive, bland meal almost redeemed by a crazy, oddly tasty dessert.

The mid-sixties must have been a time when New York City seemed overwhelming, or inconceivable, as a whole; it inspired specialized guides of the narrow-slice variety. Besides the cheap eats format of the Underground Gourmet, there is also The Night People’s Guide to New York. The weirdness of this pocket-sized nighthawk’s bible is hard to capture. That it has three introductions and prefaces, all taking contradictory stands, may give you some idea. One is a few pages by a name author (Jean Shepherd) intended to work the magic of name recognition. The other two go head to head: one describes the committee that worked together to gather information; the other offers an allegory about a young man discovering the nighttime city, drawing a young woman into his ways, marrying her… and going on to write this very book himself with her aid. The book oscillates between proselytizing for a revolutionary lifestyle (explaining the various napping schedules that allow you to live in the wee hours and still hold down a 9-5 job) and worrying that you’ll need aspirin for the inevitable 4am headache. The fine print reveals a city that does indeed sleep, although with a strong tendency toward sleepwalking. Despite invokes the thrills of a world beyond the need of rest, the book comes closer to the truth in describing the sublime thrills of a silent Grand Central at 2am. As reading material, the advantage of this one is the brief overview essays by neighborhood. They are engaging and forcefully written. A bonus is the hilarious opportunity presented by applying hindsight to the book’s prognostications: the lines describing “the district which real estate men and some shop keepers have been trying to rename ‘East Village,’ as if by invoking the word ‘village,’ high rise, high rent, and high spenders would magically appear” (54). Equally amusing is the idea that Chelsea (here called “Lower Midtown”) has potential as a nighttime hangout: “the idea is this: there’re plenty of people out at night in the Village below us; there’re plenty of people out at night in Times Square above us. What we’ve got to do is start bringing those two crowds together to this section between.” (79). Less amusing is the description of Gays in the village as “tolerated, but like Africans under Apartheid.”

The aforementioned Arthur Frommer’s Dollar-Wise Guide to New York (1966)—which appears to have been written by the great man himself—has a certain cheesy charm like that of an unfamiliar—if distinctly mediocre—sitcom. While you’re reading, it’s almost mesmeric, but when you pull yourself away, you wonder what kept you interested. The section on “discotheques,” though, approaches self-parodic genius: “Can you possibly go back home without having learned to do the frug, the Watusi and the hully-gully…? Maybe, but in case you can’t here’s the run-down….” One of the pleasures of all these books is the effect of making the familiar strange. Frommer does this beautifully: “a proper discotheque, in case you haven’t heard, is fitted out with stereophonic equipment that makes recorded music—rock ‘n roll, Big Beat, the Beatles—sound as if it were played by live musicians.”

The only one of these guides that I’ve come across in a later reprinted edition is, unsurprisingly, also the oldest: the famed WPA Guide to New York City (1939; reprint Pantheon, 1982). Unfortunately, the writing doesn’t come close in quality to the illustrations (tons of striking photos and some wonderful pencil sketches and woodcuts of the Lower East Side)—it has none of the personality of the other guides, sounding as if it were drafted by a committee. There is plenty of Blue-Guidish historical info that is, no doubt reliable, if you go in for that kind of thing (unlike Frommer’s random and unconvincing claims—he dates Luchow’s all the way back to 1822, either via typo or because he thought it sounded good). At first I was disappointed that the restaurant listings contain no written descriptions—but I’ve become progressively more enamored of the telegraphic explanations of various ethnic cuisines: “Greek: Balkan Cheeses, Fried Squid, Boiled Dandelions.”

Scattered Speculations on the History of Pita and Sushi

The history of ethnic foods is hinted at in each of these guides. Taken together, stories of the rise of fall of various dishes and cuisines can be told. In all of them, for instance, Japanese cuisine is a familiar presence, although it is defined by Sukiyaki. Teriyaki demands explanation; Sushi appears, not as an oddity, but as a low-key, “authentic,” insider favorite. (Indeed, raw food seems to have been fairly common in those heady days: middle-eastern places served Kibbe raw, and Simon mentions “raw meat sandwiches” in passing as if the reader would know what they were). One then common Japanese dish seems to have receded in the face of Udon and Sushi: “ochazuke,” apparently prepared by pouring tea over the ingredients. In these histories, defamilarization is again a perk: I will never tire of reading that “Pierre’s makes the falafel sandwich by first cutting off a large slice of the Holy Land bread so that the circle of bread forms a pocket.” (247). Ah, for such days of innocence, before every supermarket in the country stocked that weirdly sweet-stale version of pita that is so cloying to the palate.

There are other strange transformations to be noted: Sam Goody’s was once highly thought of as a place where the sales people knew their stuff and prices were as low as they could be; B. Altman was a huge, upscale department store that happened to have a used book section. But I must stop myself before I either atomize these books into bits of historical evidence or descend into nostalgia. Simon, for one, takes an admirable attitude toward the rapid course of change in the City; it would be easy enough to fall into a mindlessly nostalgic, preservationist stance in the guidebook business. After all, tourists are drawn to old stuff like bugs to a hot light bulb.

I’ll admit that I picked up the first of my collection for a purpose: heading to the subway, I snagged Simon’s book out of the Strand’s $0.48 bin, thinking that I could use it to crib info to set stories in mid-century New York. By the time I’d bought my subway token, I realized that it was much more than a crib sheet, and now that I’ve been exiled to the Midwest I enjoy it even more. But it’s not just because it permits a particularly well-rounded daydream
of city life; reading these outdated guides also reveals something of the underlying reality of the city. In her section on nightlife, Simon notes, with a jaunty tone, “Some of the specific places mentioned here may have disappeared when you get around to them, but there will very likely be comparable substitutes in possible imitations of Greek tavernas or cave restaurants or whatever one’s imagination devises, to be quickly followed by others.” Here is the magic and promise of city life: you can find anything you can dream up if you look hard enough. Just don’t expect it to be there when you come back.

NB: this essay was written in 2000, when the dream of the Old New York with its autochonthous business establishments had not yet been obliterated. Thanks to Lorin Stein for commissioning this piece and offering editorial suggestions for an issue of a Journal that was never to be.

Categories: New York City · food · guidebooks · review